EnglishLimited the number of animals in the house (not more than 2 dogs and 2 cats)In this morning I received an email from Mrs. Carmen Arsene (FNPA.ro) where she write about the grammatical and legal errors made by "Mr." deputy Andrei Sava, former PDL and now PSD, law which restricts the number of domestic animals raised in homes:
"In recent days I have received many calls and emails from owners of animals expressing concerns about press information on a draft law which restricts the number of animals kept, wondering how real and how is this dangerous project. Indeed there is this project, which was recorded in the Senate, initiated by deputy Andrei Sava was former PDL and now PSD. The project is actually amending the animal protection law by adding at least one item that is amazing and hilarious expressed. In paragraph (1) "prohibits animal growth and maintenance of large and middle size in block buildings, except the dogs and cats, but no more than 2 heads of each". The name "block buildings," probably trying to refer to blocks of flats, to use the phrase "two heads" as if you can just hold the ends of an animal, not rest, deputy forbids gain block sized animals big middle that is just what is left, horses, donkeys, sheep, goats. It also cited the "no more than 2 heads of each" that you can not analyze how illiterate can be. Article (3) is even crippled, illiterate, unintelligible, "the number of domestic animals and growing company planned maintenance on the yard individual property may not exceed three heads each, with the two neighbors surrounding villages there are not exceed 5 heads of the household ". The only thing I understand is that if we house with "yard" and keeping animals must have the consent of "two neighbors in the region surrounding"!! (So not the near neighbors!). But it is incomprehensible the word "each" from "3 heads each" refers to a family member or refer to domestic animal companion. Either way but can not exceed the number of "5 heads per household" so there are only two options no matter how many times family members have many pet species choose to care: within 3 or maximum 5 "per household" ( not "in the household"!) Besides the idea itself is to remember that this type of parliamentarians, with not thinking level of primary schooling, an expression so crippled, illiterate, decide the fate of our country in their stupid style and we pay them for this . Unfortunately there are still a draft bill initiated by the Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism on the homeowners associations who brought amendments of that and one that provides housing associations to restrict the number of animals owned or ban. Against this amendment will send a FNPA accompanied by reasoning in terms of legal and, if necessary, will act accordingly, legally. I use this context to remind (or inform those who still do not know) that according to Art. 4 of the Order approving the Methodological Norms for applying Law no. 205/2004 on the protection of animals amended and supplemented by Law 9/2008 (No 31 of 31 March 2008 issued by The National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority and no. 523 of 30 June 2008 issued by the Ministry of Interior and Administrative Reform) " The number of animals except wild animals owned by an individual or legal person is not restricted, with the condition torespect the rules on health, safety and welfare thereof, under the laws in force ". So even if there were a local device (HCL) in this regard it has become inoperable since 31 March 2008. Also, of course, imposed by an association of owners of a maximum number of animals or even prohibit ownership of animals (as happens in some cases) is illegal. " In conclusion, if the law will be approved is illegal and an abuse! Failed to mass euthanasia of dogs now they found a "loophole" for limiting aid and rescue animals kept indoors (most are taken from the streets). |
RomanianLimitarea numarului de animale crescute in casa (nu mai mult de 2 caini si 2 pisici)In dimineata asta am primit un e-mail de la doamna Carmen Arsene (FNPA) in care scrie creselile gramatice si juridice facute de "domnul" deputatul Andrei Sava, fost PDL si proaspat PSD in proiectul de lege prin care se restrictioneaza numarul de animale domestice crescute in locuinte:
"In ultimele zile am primit multe telefoane si emailuri de la stapani de animale prin care isi exprimau ingrijorarea privind informatia de presa referitoare la un proiect legislativ prin care se restrictioneaza numarul animalelor detinute, intrebandu-se cat de real si cat de periculoas este acest proiect. Intr-adevar exista acest proiect, care a fost inregistrat la Senat, initiat de deputatul Andrei Sava, fost PDL si proaspat PSD. Proiectul este de fapt unul de modificare a legii de protectie a animalelor prin adaugarea unui singur articol care este cel putin uluitor si hilar prin exprimare. In alineatul (1) “se interzice cresterea si intretinerea animalelor de talie mare si mijlocie din cladirile-bloc, exceptie fac cainii si pisicile, dar nu mai multe de 2 capete de fiecare”. De la denumirea “cladirile-bloc”, incercand probabil sa se refere la blocurile de locuinte, la utilizarea sintagmei “2 capete” de parca poti detine doar capetele dintr-un animal, restul nu, deputatul ne interzice cresterea in bloc a animalelor de talie mare si mijlocie adica cam ce mai ramane, cai, magari, ovine, caprine. Este de citat si partea “dar nu mai multe de 2 capete de fiecare” care nici nu o poti analiza cat de analfabeta poate fi. Alineatul (3) este si mai ciuntit, agramat, neinteligibil: “numarul de animale domestice de companie avute in crestere si intretinere pe o proprietate individuala cu curte nu poate depasi 3 capete de fiecare, cu acordul a doi vecini ai localitatilor limitrofe numarul acestora nu poate depasi 5 capete de pe gospodarie”. Singurul lucru care l-am inteles este ca daca avem casa “cu curte” si detinem animale trebuie sa avem acordul a “doi vecini din localitatile limitrofe” !!!!!! (deci nu a vecinilor imediati!). Insa este de neinteles daca “fiecare” din “3 capete de fiecare” se refera la membru de familie ori se refera la specia de animal domestic de companie. Oricum ar fi insa nu se poate depasi numarul de “5 capete de pe gospodarie” asa ca exista doar doua optiuni indiferent cati membri are familia ori cate specii de animale de companie alegi sa ingrijesti: maxim 3 sau maxim 5 “de pe gospodarie” (nu “in gospodarie” !) Pe langa ideea in sine este de reamintit ca acest tip de parlamentari, avand o gandire ce nu se situeaza nici la nivelul unei scolarizari primare, o exprimare atat de ciuntita, agramata, decid soarta tarii in stilul lor stupid si ii mai si platim pentru asta. Din nefericire mai exista inca un proiect legislativ initiat de Ministerul Dezvoltarii Regionale si Turismului referitor la asociatiile de proprietari la care M.A.I a adus amendamente dintre care si unul in care se prevede posibilitatea asociatiilor de locatari de a restrictiona numarul de animale detinute ori de a interzice. Impotriva acestui amendament FNPA va transmite un punct de vedere insotit de argumentatiile de natura juridica si, daca e cazul, va actiona in consecinta, pe cale legala. Uzez de acest context pentru a reaminti (sau de a informa pe cei ce inca nu stiu) ca in conformitate cu art. 4 din Ordinul pentru aprobarea Normelor metodologice de aplicare a Legii nr. 205/2004 privind protectia animalelor modificata si completata prin legea 9/2008 (nr. 31 din 31 martie 2008 emis de catre Autoritatea Nationala Sanitara Veterinara si pentru Siguranta Alimentelor respectiv nr. 523 din 30 iunie 2008 emis de Ministerul Internelor si Reformei Administrative) “Numarul de animale, cu exceptia animalelor salbatice, detinut de o persoana fizica sau juridica NU ESTE RESTRICTIONAT, cu conditia respectarii normelor de sanatate, protectie şi bunastare a acestora, prevazute de legislatia în vigoare”. Asadar chiar daca ar exista o dispozitie locala (HCL) in acest sens aceasta a devenit inoperabila incepand cu data de 31 martie 2008. De asemenea, binenteles, impunerea de catre o asociatie de proprietari a unui numar maxim de animale ori chiar interzicerea detinerii de animale (cum se intampla in unele cazuri) este ilegala." In concluzie daca legea va fi aprobata este una ilegala si un abuz! Nu au reusit cu eutanasierea in masa a cainilor acum au gasit "o portita" pt a limita ajutorul si salvarea animalelor tinute in casa (majoritatea sunt adoptate de pe strazi). |